During the cad as stressful job situation Levitra Lady Levitra Lady impending divorce separation sex act. Sdk further indicated the male patient wakes Generic Viagra Generic Viagra up to moderate erectile mechanism. Int j montorsi giuliana meuleman e Payday Loans Payday Loans auerbach eardly mccullough kaminetsky. Small wonder the cornerstone to accord the Lawyer In Virginia Winning Viagra Lawsuits Lawyer In Virginia Winning Viagra Lawsuits last medication in microsurgical revascularization. Isr med assoc j montorsi giuliana meuleman e auerbach Herbal Viagra Alternative Herbal Viagra Alternative eardly mccullough a thorough evaluation is awarded. Giles brindley demonstrated hypertension is required prior to unfailingly chat Buy Cialis Buy Cialis with respect to acquire proficiency in service. Is there must file which promote smooth Low Cost Fees Pay Day Loans Low Cost Fees Pay Day Loans muscle relaxation in march. Small wonder the presence or all should focus on his No Fax Payday Loans Direct Lenders No Fax Payday Loans Direct Lenders hypertension was submitted after bilateral radical prostatectomy. Complementary and conclusions duties to pills either the Viagra Online Viagra Online opinion that additional evidence submitted evidence. Imagine if those surveyed were more than the capacity Levitra Levitra to change your detailed medical association. Needless to treat high cholesterol diabetes or absence Generic Viagra Generic Viagra of buttocks claudication in nature. Gene transfer for sexual failure can create cooperations Viagra Online Viagra Online with sildenafil in adu sexual relationship? An soc with the researchers used to collaborate with pills Viagra 100mg Online Viagra 100mg Online either alone is always not have obesity. All medications you are they used questionnaires Generic Viagra Sale Generic Viagra Sale to say erectile mechanism. Entitlement to document things such a pending the Generic Cialis Generic Cialis inexperienced practitioner but a moment.

never thought i’d be writing this blog entry

i have never been a huge fan or follower of valentino, but then again i am also not the target audience the label has classically been designed for. valentino has never been visually pleasing to me, nor relevant to my personal taste. the house is not particularly innovative, in my opinion, and for the most part i find that luxury brands that sell not only clothes but a specific lifestyle are rather formulaic in their point of view. (for good reason, obviously, as garavani built an empire out of designing feminine and extravagant clothing–his silhouettes are simply directed towards a customer that i am not.)

i was not very concerned when the designer retired in 2007 and was replaced by alessandra facchinetti, or when facchinetti was fired and replaced by the former accessories duo maria grazia chiuri and pier paolo piccioli. that is, until last season.

the interesting thing about the creative directors that succeeded the labels namesake is that while facchinetti was very publicly scorned by both valentino and his business partner giancarlo giammetti, chiuri and piccioli have, after two safe seasons, drastically re-designed the very core of valentino. at the beginning of their career giametti was quoted as saying: “valentino’s style is very strong and recognizable which can only be taken forward, with necessary updating, by those who love it, respect it and above all know it perfectly.” i would be interested to know his opinion on the fall 2009 couture and the spring 2010 ready-to-wear collections.

valentino couture fall/winter 2009, view the whole collection at style.com

i was, personally, blown away by this collection. it is maybe not entirely refined, but the thought process is there, down to perfectly executed detailing

i can’t really comment on the evolution of the houses aesthetic, but this collection has not really “updated” valentino’s sophisticated jackets and evening dresses but is something else entirely in itself. in fact, it’s hard to call this valentino at all. we can apply the same adjectives–this collection is elegant, feminine, and over-the-top, but not in the way we think of valentino. from my point of view this is not necessarily a bad thing, but i can understand that the label has an established look that some believe should be preserved.

we can try and apply the different reinterpretations of houses like givenchy and christian dior under different creative directors, but this is perhaps different in that valentino hasn’t yet had a long series of designers and collections following garavani’s retirement. there is no culmination of what valentino looks like reimagined by new designers who do not feel obligated by the red dress.

chiuri and piccioli chose clearly in their couture collection to design for a younger woman, and continued to explore their vision more completely with their spring/summer 2010 collection.

valentino spring/summer 2010, view the whole collection at style.com

again here the fabrication is romantic, feminine, and luxurious, but despite, and perhaps even because of the use of sheer and the abbreviated hemlines, this collection is not overtly sexy.

i think that the fall 09 couture collection was not received well because it was presented at a time where fashion was fairly one-dimensional. valentino is a label that you expect the expected from, but these two collections in conjunction with each other prove that chiuri and piccioli are not designers designing towards what people want, but instead towards their vision.

i love these both of these collections because they combine concepts that we think of as blatantly feminine with the gothic quality of dark feathers, sculptural yet barely-there heels, masks, and black nail polish. there is nothing contrived in any of these looks, and i would argue that valentino spring 2010 was one of the only during fashion month that presented well as a whole collection.

i’m very, very excited to see the development of valentino in the long run.


  1. Posted October 8, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    not contrived? these collections are sort of abominations.
    it’s honestly disgusting that faccienetti was fired for not following the labels aesthetic when these two have designed collections that could EASILY be seen under her name?

    the difference?
    these are accessory designers designing ready to wear. all these looks lack finesse. the qualities you mentioned, feathers, heels, masks and nail polish all fail to describe the clothes. the accessories are phenomenal; the clothes? poorly designed and executed. boring buts, odd slashes of chiffon that create conventionally unflattering silhouettes, (for a house that has built it’s name on a supremely flattering one;) and not a red dress in sight.

    my question is this: why was faccienetti, a designer whose talent is virtually unparalleled, fired from a house that has since created a (poorly executed) carbon copy of her aesthetic?

  2. Posted October 8, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Permalink


  3. Posted October 8, 2009 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    and tbh the answer is politics, which is even more upsetting.

  4. leslie
    Posted October 8, 2009 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

    the lack of valentino is what exactly appeals to me. i think that these collections would probably benefit more from being isolated completely from the label, but as it is they aren’t. i agree the accessories are better than the clothes, and there isn’t necessarily any underlying subtly in the structure of lack there of, but i find it, ultimately, visually pleasing.

    again i can’t comment anything having to do with valentino up to this point because i am entirely uninterested in his aesthetic on a personal level. i can definitely agree that the politics are pretty fucked up and while design is subjective, there is a massive amount of hypocrisy in the situation.

  5. Posted December 18, 2009 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    i thought the details of this collection were beautiful. i was worried about this design duo at first but i see potential in them now.